We use Google Analytics to collect anonymised information about visits to our site. We also embed videos from YouTube that can place cookies on your computer. Read more about the information we store, cookies and how you can choose to disable them in our privacy policy.
An independent consumer guide to smart homes.

Dreame A1 VS Husqvarna Automower 310 Mark II

Dreame A1

4.6

Husqvarna Automower 310 Mark II

3.9
2000 m²
Maximum cutting area
1000 m²
45%
Max tilt
40 %
Yes
Perimeter wire free
No
30-70 mm
Cutting height
20-50 mm
WiFi
Connectivity
BT
Yes
Voice control
No

Dreame A1

Dreame is a Chinese company that until now produced mostly robot vacuum cleaners. Now they have taken their technology and produced their first robotic lawnmower A1. The specification looks impressive to say the least and we are in full swing testing the robot. Dreame A1 makes use of OmniSense 3D Ultra Sensing to map your garden and navigate. With the Dreame A1, you don't need accessories such as RKT antennas or buried loops in the lawn. According to the manufacturer, the mower has a precision of 1 cm and can recognize and avoid obstacles in your garden such as forgotten objects or stones. With Fast Charging, the mower recharges itself in 65 min and can then resume any mowing. The robotic lawnmower is capable of mowing up to 1000sqm per day.

The robot should be easy to clean and change the blade on your own.

Husqvarna Automower 310 Mark II

The Husqvarna Automower 310 Mark II has some similarities to its larger sibling, the Automower 415X, but they also have their distinct differences. The cutting height and cutting width are the same for both robotic lawnmowers, but there are some important aspects to consider when choosing between them.

One key difference is that the Automower 310 Mark II does not have the ability to be connected to the smart home, while the 415X has that ability. This means that the 415X can be controlled and monitored easily from your smartphone or other smart device, while the 310 Mark II lacks this feature.

Another important difference is software updates. To update the software on the Automower 310 Mark II, you need to submit it to a service workshop, while the 415X can download and install software updates independently. This makes the 415X more convenient and user-friendly when it comes to staying up to date.

A third difference to consider is the anti-theft area and the theft tracking. The Automower 415X has these features, which can be especially valuable if you live in an area where theft risks are high. On the other hand, the Automower 310 Mark II lacks these safety features.

In conclusion, if you are looking for a more affordable robotic lawnmower and do not have the need for the extra features mentioned above, the Automower 310 Mark II can be an excellent choice. It still offers reliable lawn mowing and can be a cost-effective option for keeping your lawn well-maintained.